Filed under:

Forrest Gump Doesn't Deserve The Hate

I guess most people hate it because it got the best of both worlds: won several Oscars and made a lot of money. And in the same year, The Shawshank Redemption and Pulp Fiction were also released.

By Satyam Ghimire | Date:

Last modified date:


Also available as a YouTube video.

I didn’t know people labeled Forrest Gump as a bad picture. I always loved it. For me it’s a beautiful story of a good man and I am entertained. Plus the soundtrack is one of my favorites.

Forrest Gump sitting on a bench
Frame, rights belong to the respective distributor and producer.

The main argument Forrest Gump haters make is that Forrest himself has no character arc. He is a simpleton with no depth. He doesn’t change at all throughout the movie. He makes a fool of himself during historical events and in front of famous people, rather than trying to understand what’s going on and behaving properly. And it’s a nostalgic idolization of the boomer generation, a sort of flattery to them. Give them flashbacks of what happened in their time and they will vote for you in awards and buy tickets. It’s a conservative propaganda, you know, do what society tells you to do and you will earn medals, give interviews, and be a millionaire.

Yes, Forrest Gump doesn’t change at all, but the people around him do change because of him. Primarily Lieutenant Dan and Jenny. Dan learns to appreciate life and make his peace with God, though he wanted to die in the war. Jenny is redeemed from her behavior and choices, all that were a direct result of trauma and abuse by her step father. In the end, she makes her peace too, and she knows she has finally found a loving home.

Forrest helps strangers find a community and hope, from something as absurd as running across America. Bubba gets a friend who listens to him, and his family gets a lot of money from Bubba-Gump shrimp company and they escape their generational poverty.

Though the movie is told from his perspective, the movie isn’t totally about Forrest but people around him. He is like a feather that floats in the air, those who see or experience that floating feather find it beautiful, but the feather is still the same.

Yes, Forrest is slow and limited, but he still has depth. He knows what love is, he knows how important it is to be smart and breaks down while asking if his son is smart, unlike him. He knows his life would have been a lot better if he was smart. He has this naive habit of seeing the best in people, he knows that people have better self insides, though they seem unaware of it and believe otherwise.

The movie is also about destiny and fate and trying to live with it. Forrest can’t help it but be stupid. Just like Jenny can’t help herself and walk on a good path. Just like Lieutenant Dan can’t help but curse his life. The movie is a sort of balance between fantasy and reality. A slow man is a war-hero, wins ping pong, gets to meet famous people, gets to be a millionaire. That’s fantasy. But the same man couldn’t get any love from that one person whom he always wanted. And only later this person turns up with a baby, when she has AIDS and no one wants to have her anymore. That’s reality.

Nostalgia for the boomer generation? Yes, there is, and so what? Promotes conservatism? What?

I guess most people hate it because it has the best of both worlds. It won several Oscars and also made a lot of money, 677 million dollars. Adjusted for inflation that’s like 1.44 billion dollars in August, 2024. And in the same year so many good movies were released, primarily The Shawshank Redemption and Pulp Fiction. Both were robbed from important awards and both made little money.

Forrest Gump can’t get away with this, can it? In my opinion too, The Shawshank Redemption should have won the best picture and should have made good money. That’s a much better film. That’s my favorite film. But that doesn’t give me a reason to hate Forrest Gump, does it?

Subscribe to the newsletter?

Share on social medias:


Read also:

Filed under:

It seems a duty of a great artist like Miyazaki to spread hope and optimism, even though he himself doesn’t subscribe to those beliefs.

By Satyam Ghimire || Date: 2024 September 17


Also available as a YouTube video.
hayao miyazaki and his boy and the heron

When some great artists approach the end of their life, they entertain the idea of a successor, though they know deep down that no one can truly take their place. In his latest film, The Boy and The Heron, Hayao Miyazaki has told a story of one such creator. Though on the surface the film is about a young boy Mahito overcoming grief of his mother's death, and like other Miyazaki's films, follows a journey through a fantasy land filled with colorful characters. But of course, this perspective has not much to do with the question which almost was the title of the movie, “how do you live”? Mahito’s great-grand uncle created a world parallel to ours, a world with its own small set of creatures and magic. This old man is looking, waiting, for someone to take over his work. To wash it pure and bring once again the balance and harmony among the creatures upon whom he had sprinkled life.

To continue his legacy, to build a better paradise. Of course Mahito rejects the old man’s offer. He says he has malice and greed and he would corrupt everything. He would rather choose the real world, with all its shortcomings, and be an ordinary man. The old man, as if he already expected this answer, isn't sad or angry at getting a “No!", even though he had high hopes for Mahito. Of course Miyazaki looked out for potential candidates, to pass his torch hand to hand, but no one was good enough for him. Perhaps his judgment was right, perhaps it wasn’t and he was too hard on others. ...continue reading...

pom poko movie by Isao Takahata
Filed under:

The scene also reminds me of a quote by F. Scott Fitzgerald, "The loneliest moment in someone's life is when they are watching their world fall apart and all they can do is stare blankly." Tanuki are alone. And they can only stare.


By Satyam Ghimire | Date: 2024 April 30

Also available as a YouTube video.
Filed under:

We are expanding upon the mental math trick of Hans Bethe that impressed Richard Feynman in Los Alamos.

Date: 2025 May 29

Filed under:

Did you know that James Cameron got his idea about “The Terminator” in his dreams, while he was sleeping? You better keep sleeping.

Date: 2023 July 17

Filed under:

If someone lives in your house, in your room, and is the child of your very own parents, who do you think that will be? I don’t mean the body.

Date: 2023 July 17

Filed under:

Red was pretty much like Brooks, but luckily he got a friend: Andy. What if Brooks had a friend like Andy in his time?

By Satyam Ghimire || Date: 2024 April 3


Also available as a YouTube video.
Brooks on the bus, clutching his seat

The Shawshank Redemption is certainly one of the best stories to implement this old and simple storytelling formula. A hopeful hero is faced with obstacles. He meets other characters who are hopeless. He tries to inspire them but they find it hard to share his optimism. They have their own reasons. Andy was the hero with thrust heroic qualities. Brooks was the doomed side character. And Red was somewhere in between. It is Red’s transformation that we saw in the film, from his refusal of hope throughout the film to finally embracing it at the end.

Andy, Brooks, and Red Andy was a talented banker on the outside, and that helps him on the inside. In several scenes throughout the film. Remember the scene on the roof which ends with the crew drinking icy-old, Bohemia-style beer, and the colossal prick even managed to sound magnanimous. Hell, they could have been tarring the roof of their own houses. On the other hand, Brooks was doomed from the start. He came to Shawshank in 1905. And when he was released in 1955, a total stranger to the ways of the outside world. He saw an automobile once when he was a kid and when he got out, they were everywhere. ...continue reading...